Embalmer's Delight
Here’s a scenario: your life is plodding along. By all counts, things are good. The externals on a one-sheet stack up like the modeled food they put in display windows of Japanese restaurants in Taiwan. Slick soba noodles, slick rosy pickled ginger. Slick greens. Slick sesame beef. Everything slick. All the cracks spackled. Everything feeling so reasonably decent barring the little flares (that I’d forgotten about until right this moment right this now trying to write about the perceived flat-lining of my life. )
(I apparently sometimes speak only semi-accurately about my experiences. Noted.
Anyway,) have been rehearsing lots and not reading much lately. I mean, I had a short love affair with Alain De Botton a few weeks back and before that Thomas Lynch and between, Chucky B. (everybody's favorite poet/day-puker). Felt the requisite inspiration. Internalized a small fraction of what I read. Announced to the world the need to read a little each day to feel good. Then stopped reading every day. Started to languish. Yesterday I crawled back in bed with Thomas Lynch, poet/undertaker.
How I feel about this: really excellent. It was Monday and I woke up with no particular motives for the day except a pronounced craving for cherry chocolate scones and coffee, so I got dressed, grabbed the keys, pulled a book off the mantel en route to the front door and drove to Susina’s (a tasty bakery on Beverly where they give free refills on big mugs of Italian coffee) Then I reopened Lynch’s The Undertaking: Life Studies from the Dismal Trade and backtracked a little from where I’d left off a couple months ago.
I want to talk about the last of the 3 essays I read that morning. It was about toilets and taking shits in the Irish hillside under a huge gaping sky and the tangible difference between that and having your excrement whisked away from you in a little whitewater circus at the bottom of a porcelain bowl. About how these are analogs to our relationship to things like decomposition, death, and the inevitable cycles of life. He goes on to talk about homes and how they used to be these multi-generational units with babies being born in one room while great-grandmothers struggled with tuberculosis in a bedroom two floors above. How life and death, beginnings and endings existed side by side so that people had a better sense of their own mortality and possibly (I think this is what the author was suggesting) a better grip on life.
I dunno. Reading his essays sorta reshuffled my brain temporarily and shifted things into some sort of perspective. I’d stop every few paragraphs to think about the people in my life and how nice it is that I have them and how nice it is that I have a life. Also couldn’t stop pausing just to notice how recent conflicts were losing their barbs, like how all the stuff that'd been harassing my brain had -- within the span of an hour and a half of reading-- become pretty utterly trivial and distant, like What’s it worth if we’re all gonna die?
So, thanks to Thomas Lynch and his willingness to synthesize his craps with meaningful thoughts, I was thrilling on life again.
Of course an hour later I made it clear to Alanna who showed up to our Fascinoma meeting wearing my black sweater that "I really need my black sweater back because you’ve had it for like four months and I really used to wear that black sweater all the time!” And it wasn’t enough to keep me later that evening from frantically loading gear in angry repressed silence while I thought of all the reasons Kim was solely to blame for yet another manic Journey to the Gig..
But in both of the above instances, harmony/stasis was found much more quickly than I’m historically known for, so Alice-dog does appear to be learning a few new tricks.
Not dead yet,
alice

